Risk Intelligence Dashboard
Site: Iron Ore Operations — Western Australia | Period: Last 90 Days
147
12
34
67%
Incident Trend
Weekly count by severity
AI Insight: Vehicle interactions increased 40% in February, correlating with increased truck activity at Pit 4 and seasonal production ramp.
Incidents by Type
Distribution across categories
Critical Control Performance
Effectiveness vs 85% target
Incident Heatmap by Location
Incidents per location (90 days)
Note: Pit 4 Haul Road accounts for 19% of all incidents this quarter.
Predictive Risk Flags
AI-generated risk predictions based on incident patterns
Based on current incident patterns, this area has a HIGH probability of a serious vehicle interaction within the next 30 days.
Contributing Factors:
- •40% increase in vehicle interaction events this quarter
- •Exclusion zone controls failing at 62% effectiveness
- •Spotter coverage gaps identified on night shift
- •Increased haul truck movements due to seasonal production ramp
Recommended Actions:
- 1.Review exclusion zone design and install physical barriers at high-risk entry points
- 2.Increase spotter coverage to dual coverage during peak activity
- 3.Implement enhanced dust suppression schedule for all Pit 4 haul roads
- 4.Conduct mandatory toolbox talk on vehicle interaction risks for all operators
Working at heights incidents trending upward. 3 harness-related events in the last 30 days, including one confirmed fall with injury.
Contributing Factors:
- •3 height-related incidents in 30 days (above baseline of 1)
- •Harness compliance issues identified in 2 events
- •Temporary guardrail removal during maintenance creating exposure
Recommended Actions:
- 1.Verify fall protection training currency for all Level 3 workers
- 2.Implement buddy-check system for harness connections
- 3.Review temporary guardrail removal procedures
Four isolation-related events in 90 days, three occurring on night shift. Procedures may not reflect current equipment configurations.
Contributing Factors:
- •75% of isolation incidents occur on night shift
- •Backup power systems not consistently included in isolation procedures
- •One near-miss involving energised bus bar (INC-0087)
Recommended Actions:
- 1.Complete isolation procedure audit for all equipment with backup power
- 2.Implement mandatory dual-verification for high-voltage isolations
- 3.Review night shift supervision levels for electrical maintenance
Shift Comparison
Day Shift vs Night Shift incidents
Day Shift
89
61% of total
Night Shift
58
39% of total
AI Insight: Night shift has 2.3x higher rate of fatigue-related incidents per worker-hour. Spotter protocol breaches are 40% more common on night shift, particularly between 2:00-5:00 AM.
Recent Incidents
Last 90 days
| ID | Description | Type | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0147 | Light vehicle entered active exclusion zone while CAT 793 wa... | Near Miss | High | Open |
| 0146 | Worker fell approximately 2 metres from scaffolding. Harness... | Medical Treatment Injury | Critical | Under Investigation |
| 0145 | Two operators reported skin irritation after contact with re... | First Aid Injury | Medium | Open |
| 0144 | Wrench dropped from Level 2 maintenance platform. Landed in ... | Near Miss | Medium | Closed |
| 0143 | Isolation point for Conveyor C4 found with lock removed duri... | Hazard Report | High | Open |
| 0142 | Grader operator reversed without completing 360-degree check... | Near Miss | Medium | Closed |
| 0141 | Minor seepage detected at tailings embankment monitoring poi... | Environmental Incident | Medium | Open |